About
A small team doing one thing well.
[FOUNDER-EDIT] Replace this paragraph with a short founder bio — anchored on the operator's Alberta bar admission and the team's focus on standardized due diligence for cross-border charitable grant-making.
Posture
What we are — and what we aren't.
We are
A diligence service with attested output.
We compile factual due diligence summaries on charitable organizations and have a lawyer and a CPA attest that the work was performed in accordance with our published methodology. The output is a verifiable record. The attestation is a credibility signal about that record.
We are not
A law firm advising you.
We do not render legal opinions, give legal advice, or represent customers. Use of the service does not create an attorney-client relationship. The lawyer's signature is a credibility signal about the work product, not the rendering of legal services to the recipient.
How we differ
Standardized output, attested, repeatable.
[FOUNDER-EDIT] A short, factual comparison versus equivalency-determination services and ad-hoc vendor research: speed, jurisdiction coverage, pricing, and methodology.
The difference is method — a standardized review with attestation — not substance. The distinction matters because foundation auditors want a record they can verify independently, not a narrative they have to interrogate.
Methodology lineage
- Published at
- cdd.complyhq.ca/legal/methodology
- Versioned
- Issue date is bound to the methodology version in force on that date
- Source register
- Available with the white paper on request
Insurance and liability posture
Coverage scoped to record production.
[FOUNDER-EDIT] Carrier name, coverage limit, and confirmation that the policy contemplates the production and attestation of due diligence records (rather than the rendering of legal opinions).